Our Socratic Oath

Our Socratic Oath

I will watch for, believe in, notice, love and engage the genius of those in my charge.

The Aim of Education and the Role of School

Who is driving what goes on in schools, and toward what interests? Are educational reforms intended to regain our competitive edge in the world? to keep our jobs from going to foreigners? to serve the needs of corporate America?

These questions seem important as we consider a course for American education. The debates, however, are ancillary to the core purpose of education. So, if we are feeling a little lost, perhaps Maggie Doyne’s story can bring us back to our center.

Maggie awoke one morning at the age of eighteen with the profound fear that after 13 years of school “I knew very little about myself and what I wanted in my life.” School taught her some kinds of knowledge but nothing of “the inside sort of things.” She decided to postpone college and get herself out into the world. In the course of the next five years she discovered other worlds and peoples, depths of human suffering and joy she didn’t know existed, and in the process she built an orphanage and a school for 200 children and “…got my passion back to live and to learn and to be human on this earth.”

She says, “I was lucky that I woke up with that when I was 18.”

For this educator Maggie’s story is not so much about Maggie doing good but about Maggie engaging her genius in the education of her character. For this is our core business; i.e. to lead each character out into the world to function creatively, effectively and gracefully within it. (For more of Maggie’s story watch the video athttp://vimeo.com/15991500.)

Genius is the voice of character—something each of us has rather than something that a few of us could become if we practiced for 10,000 hours. In ancient Rome genius was the guiding spirit in each person. When educators partner up with a child’s genius, we create the conditions for self-actualization.

But self-actualization is not the end game (as I once thought when studying Abraham Maslow) but a quality of experience that each of us can have at any moment in time. Maggie seems to have spent the last five years in continual self-actualization.

Watching Maggie talk about the last five years of her life puts talk of the social, political, economic and moral purposes of education into perspective, and reminds us that we are in the business of growing self-confident learners who have a sense of their own mission in the world and who can merge their desires with the needs and wants of others.

Children come to us expecting school to be real life, not some holding pattern in preparation for real work. In May, when I have asked kindergartners what they are looking forward to in first grade they almost always say: “homework.” How is it we let them down, so often? There is no need for school to be some sort of purgatory they have to pass through before they can get on with their central question: “Who am I in the world?” We can make it our business right away.

For best results engage genius. When the genius is engaged light comes into the eyes and work proceeds with abandon almost oblivious to issues of strength and weakness.

Building children’s character for character’s sake not only addresses this need, but will probably also result in all the outcomes imagined by those who see our children as a product. Young people who are leaders and creative thinkers will find their way to fill the positions required by our nation and the world. Self-directed, self-disciplined people will lead themselves into occupations that serve public interests, and also be able to change when the marketplace changes.

Happiness, success, winning, and achievement are not what we should wish for our children but rather the grit to live in life’s tensions—the confidence to learn from conflict, mistakes, disappointment, failure, loneliness and losing. When a person is fully herself, she is also harmonizing herself with her environment. The fulfillment of Maggie includes her constructive impact on the environment. This is the essence of integrity—wholeness that includes what is good for self as well as others.

The education profession needs a Socratic Oath. Here’s my proposal for one: I will watch for, believe in, notice, love and engage the genius of those in my charge. If this were our Socratic Oath, we would send young people into the world who a) keep America competitive, b) help to strengthen the local community and the global economy, c) supply good workers for the work force, d) further the cause of democracy, and e) maximize students’ chances of getting into the next appropriate level of academia.

Our Socratic Oath: I will watch for, believe in, notice, love and engage the genius of those in my charge.. - Rick Ackerly Our Socratic Oath: I will watch for, believe in, notice, love and engage the genius of those in my charge.. – Rick Ackerly

My dream is that all parents, teachers and all those responsible for children would take the Socratic Oath, that they would let nothing (not standardized tests, curricula, school district policies and procedures, the anxiety of other adults, their own fear of failure, etc) …nothing get in the way of holding true to that oath, and that no child in the world were without an adult who has taken the oath on their behalf.

{ 3 trackbacks }

Take Back our Schools. Hmmm. What Would that Look Like?
July 31, 2011 at 8:11 pm
Results of The Willful Child Caption Contest
September 1, 2011 at 3:00 am
Procrustean Education
September 4, 2011 at 5:35 am

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Don Blohowiak August 21, 2011 at 5:13 am

Hi Rick,

Wonderful post. Love the idea of the Socratic Oath.

Three thoughts for you.

1. You wrote, “self-actualization is not the end game (as I once thought when studying Abraham Maslow) but a quality of experience that each of us can have at any moment in time.”

Yes. You might be interested to know that Maslow himself thought this! I am a Maslovian scholar working on my dissertation about Maslow. After popularizing self-actualization, he became concerned with two things: 1) What’s next, after SA — what does, or can it lead to? And: might one’s focus on SA encourage one to become “a selfish bastard?” [Maslow’s words].

2. You always reflect a key Maslovian idea in your comment about “a quality of experience that each of us can have at any moment in time.” Somewhere in the recesses of your mind, your little grey cells may fire at the term “peak experience” — another Maslovian idea. And, as he described them, peak experiences were not the outcomes of scaling mountains or doing great deeds but could be the “illuminations” — the flashes of insight — from everyday experiences such as “looking at a pile of dirty dishes after a dinner party.” In other words, by living a life full of awareness, being open to experience and meaning, a richness of and joyfulness for life could be experienced in a way that would otherwise otherwise be missed in life’s apparent mundanities.

Introducing children to awareness, openness and meaning from their everyday experiences is an exciting prospect indeed!

3. On the idea of Genius that you describe, you might enjoy a book by a friend and colleague of mine, Dick Richards. He tracked the historical idea of Daemon, Genius, Gift — one’s unique expression of talent in the world. Dick provides a thorough guide to discovering and deploying Genius. While the book’s praxis is aimed at a corporate audience, Dick’s milieu for decades, it is apropos for any audience, including children. Teens and young adults thinking about potential career interests surely would get a great deal from this work. The book is “Is Your Genius at Work?” ISBN: 0891061940.

Warm regards,


Rick August 21, 2011 at 5:18 am

Thank you so much for this. It is both educational and affirming. You just sold a book for your friend. I guess I have always been a Maslovian and it is nice to have you for an intellectual partner. Let’s keep in touch.

theophochenar August 27, 2012 at 12:27 pm

Conocimiento Ministro Khieu Kanharith dijo a los periodistas que en que Devillers, un arquitecto, hab¨ªa tomado a solo en de modo que usted puede Vajilla de porcelana chino el martes entonces que en cuanto a entre su propia voluntad, sin una escolta de la de la franc¨¦s. ghd falsas
“¨¦l se fue voluntariamente como considerado como testigo, “¨¦l your man , y agreg¨® que esto China dio seguridades de que so Devillers s¨®lo se requiere para de a ayudarle a justo antes que se les permita a volver a . ghd baratas
Esposa de Bo Gu Kailai, fue nombrado por meramente por China y Taiwan siendo actualmente a durante todo estos asesinato en noviembre pasado acerca de entre el empresario brit¨¢nico Neil Heywood. Mutuamente y despu¨¦s de que como una manera de estar cerca para su novia es . http://www.ghdbaratasespana.info

UnlotonaSop April 9, 2013 at 8:46 pm
Robert The Bruce January 1, 2018 at 9:19 am

The “Socratic Oath” must first dodge the bullet of politics. IE: There are no rules until we the people make them. Redacted: “There are no rules until you make them AND there are no anecdotes and no innuendos until you try to make the rules!” And do we the geniuses get invited to make sense of innuendo and anecdote? Nope… But Why?

Because of “combat capitalism!” And yes these sentences are “proprietary statements” which have just been disclosed for free. If we the capitalists at the leading edge of capitalism are privileged to genius that is not “formally purchased” by its parent owner, the leading edge of propriety is discarded and the value and equity of genius is taken by the rulers of power and finance in a heartbeat. And this is not taught to our geniuses nor reiterated among the general populous! And you might accidentally learn these semantics in a course taken in college, but in my experience, you simply have to be lucky enough to be observant at the right time. Myopia can affect anyone!

Leave a Comment